All business decision tools
Would faster recruiting justify the extra spend?
Cap recovered vacancy days at current vacancies and value them at evidence-based contribution loss.
Example scenario
Editable demonstration inputs, not verified industry benchmarks. Enable JavaScript to calculate your own scenario.
- Roles filled / year
- 60
- Current vacancy days / role
- 75
- Target vacancy days / role
- 50
- Contribution or coverage cost / vacancy day
- $250
- Additional recruiting cost / hire
- $2,500
- Annual recruiting-process investment
- $30,000
Annual faster-hiring net benefit
Example result only, not a forecast or promise.
- Vacancy days removed
- 1,500 days
- Gross vacancy value recovered
- $375,000
- Added annual recruiting spend
- $180,000
What to do with this result
Validate which vacancies truly constrain output and whether faster hiring changes retention or candidate quality.
Know what is inside the model.
Planning model, not personalized financial advice. Your inputs remain in your browser.
Calculation method
Annual net benefit = filled roles × (current vacancy days − target vacancy days) × value per vacancy day − extra cost per hire × hires − program cost.
Assumptions and limitations
- Example inputs are editable scenarios, not Aryo results or independently verified industry benchmarks.
- Time value is not guaranteed payroll savings. Include adoption, human review, exceptions, security and change management in implementation decisions.