All business decision tools
Does running faster produce more good units—or just more scrap?
Compare effective good-unit throughput and material loss at two operating speeds.
Example scenario
Editable demonstration inputs, not verified industry benchmarks. Enable JavaScript to calculate your own scenario.
- Current gross units / hour
- 100
- Current good-unit yield
- 98 %
- Proposed gross units / hour
- 120
- Proposed good-unit yield
- 92 %
- Annual operating hours
- 4,000
- Contribution / shipped good unit
- $10
- Material loss / scrapped unit
- $12
Annual speed-change contribution
Example result only, not a forecast or promise.
- Additional good units
- 49,600
- Additional scrap units
- 30,400
- Additional scrap material cost
- $364,800
What to do with this result
Run a controlled speed trial and check downstream demand, customer defects and maintenance impact before increasing the setpoint.
Know what is inside the model.
Planning model, not personalized financial advice. Your inputs remain in your browser.
Calculation method
Annual contribution difference = hours × [(new rate × new yield − old rate × old yield) × good-unit contribution − change in scrap rate × material loss].
Assumptions and limitations
- Example inputs are editable scenarios, not Aryo results or independently verified industry benchmarks.
- Recovered capacity is not booked revenue or automatic cash savings. Validate the bottleneck, quality and demand before monetizing output.