All business decision tools
Does faster coding survive review, testing and defect rework?
Compare implementation effort with review, validation and expected production-fix effort.
Example scenario
Editable demonstration inputs, not verified industry benchmarks. Enable JavaScript to calculate your own scenario.
- Delivered changes / year
- 3,000
- Baseline coding hours / change
- 4
- Coding effort reduced with AI
- 35 %
- Additional review & test hours / change
- 0.6
- Additional defects requiring rework
- 5 %
- Hours / additional defect
- 8
- Loaded engineering cost / hour
- $100
- Annual tool & governance cost
- $80,000
Annual net engineering time value
Example result only, not a forecast or promise.
- Engineering hours released
- 1,200
- Extra review & testing hours
- 1,800
- Expected additional defect rework hours
- 1,200
What to do with this result
Measure merged-and-validated changes, not generated lines of code; track escaped defects and cycle time alongside labor time.
Know what is inside the model.
Planning model, not personalized financial advice. Your inputs remain in your browser.
Calculation method
Hours released = changes × (baseline coding hours × reduction − additional review/test hours − additional defect probability × fix hours).
Assumptions and limitations
- Example inputs are editable scenarios, not Aryo results or independently verified industry benchmarks.
- Time value is not guaranteed payroll savings. Include adoption, human review, exceptions, security and change management in implementation decisions.